User avatar
By paesano
#324539
Boro Friend wrote:Let's keep it simple. Anyone who can help turn the tide from the slow progressive movement toward a socialist, marxist, communist, or state capitalism agenda ,or what ever the hell they are calling it , is needed . If someone can't or won't measure up to the job , then they need to go , regardless of party registration.


Correct BF :D
User avatar
By ElephantInTheRoom
#324540
Stinky Pete wrote:
Sandpiper wrote:Will any of the anti-O'Donnell bashers please reply with some exact reasons why Ms. O'Donnell isn't qualified.


Will any of the pro-O'Donnell people please reply with any reason why she is qualified?


A better question to ask, to put things in context. What made Mike Castle so qualified?
User avatar
By ElephantInTheRoom
#324541
BigGabber wrote:
Stinky Pete wrote:
Sandpiper wrote:Will any of the anti-O'Donnell bashers please reply with some exact reasons why Ms. O'Donnell isn't qualified.


Will any of the pro-O'Donnell people please reply with any reason why she is qualified?


They can't come up with a reason other than she's a republican and they want any and all democrats out thinking it will fix the problems we have. Sad very sad.


BigGabber, What qualifications did Obama have to be President other than being a "Community Organizer" for ACORN? Also, tell us what problems he fixed.
User avatar
By pinkie1978
#324542
BigGabber wrote:
Stinky Pete wrote:
Sandpiper wrote:Will any of the anti-O'Donnell bashers please reply with some exact reasons why Ms. O'Donnell isn't qualified.


Will any of the pro-O'Donnell people please reply with any reason why she is qualified?


They can't come up with a reason other than she's a republican and they want any and all democrats out thinking it will fix the problems we have. Sad very sad.

As long as the republican is NOT a progressive.
User avatar
By Stinky Pete
#324543
ElephantInTheRoom wrote:BigGabber, What qualifications did Obama have to be President other than being a "Community Organizer" for ACORN? Also, tell us what problems he fixed.


Let me understand this. You're pointing to Obama as an example of someone who had little experience, and you're using him as a reason someone should vote for O'Donnell? Really? You're that impressed with what Obama has done? Like, look at this guy! He had no experience, and look how great he has been! Is that what you're saying?
User avatar
By Stinky Pete
#324544
Now this is a legitimate response. I don't agree with voting for a crazy person just because she's not the other guy, and I don't believe the whole socialist/marxist/communist thing, but at least BF put together a complete couple of sentences that explains a valid reason.

Boro Friend wrote:Let's keep it simple. Anyone who can help turn the tide from the slow progressive movement toward a socialist, marxist, communist, or state capitalism agenda ,or what ever the hell they are calling it , is needed . If someone can't or won't measure up to the job , then they need to go , regardless of party registration.
User avatar
By pinkie1978
#324545
Stinky Pete wrote:
ElephantInTheRoom wrote:BigGabber, What qualifications did Obama have to be President other than being a "Community Organizer" for ACORN? Also, tell us what problems he fixed.


Let me understand this. You're pointing to Obama as an example of someone who had little experience, and you're using him as a reason someone should vote for O'Donnell? Really? You're that impressed with what Obama has done? Like, look at this guy! He had no experience, and look how great he has been! Is that what you're saying?

No sp he is saying that he was elected for doing nuting. Why not her. She is not a progressive.
User avatar
By ElephantInTheRoom
#324546
Stinky Pete wrote:Now this is a legitimate response. I don't agree with voting for a crazy person just because she's not the other guy, and I don't believe the whole socialist/marxist/communist thing, but at least BF put together a complete couple of sentences that explains a valid reason.

Boro Friend wrote:Let's keep it simple. Anyone who can help turn the tide from the slow progressive movement toward a socialist, marxist, communist, or state capitalism agenda ,or what ever the hell they are calling it , is needed . If someone can't or won't measure up to the job , then they need to go , regardless of party registration.


I'll second that! Boro Friend does make sense most of the time. I especially like where he said, "or won't measure up to the job , then they need to go , regardless of party registration" Now you know why Mike Castle lost the primary. I really hope the GOP establishment is getting the memo!
User avatar
By Stinky Pete
#324547
pinkie1978 wrote:No sp he is saying that he was elected for doing nuting. Why not her. She is not a progressive.


Ok. I'm OK with that last part. For the first part, I'd reply "How's that working out for you?"
  • 1
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15