- Mon Jul 03, 2017 2:05 pm
So show me that table in 1935 numbers so you can understand what I was speaking of in the remark you quoted. Things changed a great deal since then, 2013 actuaries isn't any comparison for the discussion. Needless to say the program that was created for supplemental income has gotten to the point where it is headed down hill like a snowball headed for hell.
It's not that what you say is wrong, it simply a matter of perspective.
Walter E. Williams, professor of economics at GMU, stated "Government income redistribution programs produce the same result as theft. In fact, that's what a thief does; he redistributes income. The difference between government and thievery is mostly a matter of legality